The Court of Appeal for California’s Fourth Appellate District recently confirmed that the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act (CUTSA), a broad statute intended to be the last word in trade secret misappropriation cases, does not preclude separate but related common law claims, so long as these claims are not based entirely on the trade secret
Wall Street Journal Reports Increase in Non-Compete Lawsuits
The Wall Street Journal on line has taken a recent interest in non-competes in a pair of recent one-line articles (protected by pay wall) on August 12 and August 14, 2013. Both pieces cite to a study commissioned by the Journal showing that the number of lawsuits filed over non-competes went up 60 percent between
North Dakota Supreme Court Upholds Judgment for Competing in Breach of Employment Contract while Still Employed
The North Dakota Supreme Court upheld a judgment finding two employees of SolarBee, Inc., a North Dakota corporation that manufactures solar-powered water circulators, liable for a total of $621,800 in damages for breaching a non-compete agreement while still employed. The Court’s decision in SolarBee, Inc. v. Walker, No. 2012015 (June 24, 2013), is a
Georgia Supreme Court Rejects Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine
The inevitable disclosure doctrine is a common law doctrine that has been used by some courts to prevent a former employee from working for a competitor, even in the absence of a non-compete, because the former employee’s new job duties would inevitably require him to rely upon, use or disclose his former employer’s trade secrets.
Unfair Competition Claim Based on Copyright Infringement Preempted by Copyright Act
A federal court in California has held that a state law claim that a competitor engaged in unfair competition by creating infringing work after hiring former employees who stole proprietary information is preempted by the federal Copyright Act. Metabyte, Inc. v. NVidia Corp., et al., Case No. 12-0044 SC (N.D. Cal. April 22, 2013.
Metabyte
Plaintiff in Dispute over LinkedIn Account gets “Zero” Damages
Plaintiff pro se Linda Eagle, the former president of banking education company Edcomm, Inc. ended up empty handed even though she prevailed on the merits of her claims of invasion of privacy by misappropriation of identity in her federal lawsuit filed over the alleged hijacking of her LinkedIn account by her former employer following the
Another New York Federal Court Narrowly Construes the Federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
When an executive search firm bought the goodwill and other assets of a similar firm and learned that the individual sellers took client lists and diverted business in violation of their non-compete agreements, it terminated the sellers’ employment and sued them and other third-party defendants for violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”) as
North Dakota Non-Compete Law Shares History with California
North Dakota has one of the fastest-growing workforces in the country as the result of recent advances in extracting natural gas and oil. As more employers seek to hire in or transfer employees to the Peace Garden State, many are surprised to discover that North Dakota law prohibits non-compete agreements. North Dakota Century Code Section
Court Orders Monitoring to Ensure Employee does not Breach Non-Compete
A U.S. District Judge in Connecticut recently issued an injunction against a former employee of Amphenol Corp and his new employer, TE Connectivity, Ltd, despite the lack of any evidence of competition in breach of his non-compete agreement. The decision in Amphenol v Paul, Civ. No. 3:12cv543 (D. Conn. Nov. 9, 2012), involved a
eBay Sued to Halt Enforcement of “No Hire” Agreement
The U.S. Department of Justice has filed an antitrust lawsuit against eBay, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The suit, filed on November 16, 2012, claims that eBay violated antitrust laws by entering into an agreement not to hire or recruit the employees of a competitor, Intuit, Inc.